evolving an electro...
 
Notifications
Clear all

evolving an electronic brain

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Likes
132 Views
robotBuilder
(@robotbuilder)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2069
Topic starter  

I thought this might be interesting for anyone having an interest in evolving an electronic brain.

(two people have shown an interest in the subject, @inq and @thrandell

https://www.wired.com/1997/05/es-evolutionary/

 


   
Quote
Ron
 Ron
(@zander)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 5900
 

Posted by: @robotbuilder

I thought this might be interesting for anyone having an interest in evolving an electronic brain.

(two people have shown an interest in the subject, @inq and @thrandell

https://www.wired.com/1997/05/es-evolutionary/

 

Do you really think information that is 26 years old in a field that is as fast changing as this has a remote chance of being relevant now?

I have noticed that you often quote very old references. In my experience, anything in the field of computers that is 2 years old or older is out of date.

You might disagree, but this is my experience after 64 years of computer involvement.

 

Arduino says and I agree, in general, the const keyword is preferred for defining constants and should be used instead of #define
"Never wrestle with a pig....the pig loves it and you end up covered in mud..." anon
My experience hours are >75,000 and I stopped counting in 2004.
Major Languages - 360 Macro Assembler, Intel Assembler, PLI/1, Pascal, C plus numerous job control and scripting


   
ReplyQuote
THRandell
(@thrandell)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 216
 

Hi Casey,

Thanks for pointing out your post to me.  I’m not sure that I’d call my interest in evolving robot control systems the same as evolving a  robot ‘brain’, but I did give it a quick read.  Most of this kind of stuff seems like pop science to me so I tend to speed read it hoping to find some nugget of interest.  What did you think of the article?

Tom

To err is human.
To really foul up, use a computer.


   
ReplyQuote
robotBuilder
(@robotbuilder)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2069
Topic starter  

@zander

Do you really think information that is 26 years old in a field that is as fast changing as this has a remote chance of being relevant now?

Clearly not a history buff 🙂

I find it interesting to see how ideas have evolved and been built on over time.

Isn't the source being used by @thrandell also a bit "old"?

Automatic Creation of an Autonomous Agent: Genetic Evolution of a Neural-Network Driven Robot (1994), Floreano, D., Mondada, F.

The concepts haven't changed over time they have simply been added to. I have found some of the earlier books explained those concepts more clearly to a simple person like myself compared with some of the more trendy up to date and complex literature. I am glad was able to learn about electronics and programming back in the simpler older days.


   
ReplyQuote
robotBuilder
(@robotbuilder)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2069
Topic starter  

@thrandell 

 Most of this kind of stuff seems like pop science to me so I tend to speed read it hoping to find some nugget of interest.  What did you think of the article?

I guess I have a different background.  I followed this sort of stuff for a long time.

 


   
ReplyQuote