Will
Will
@will
Member
Joined: 2021-06-28 10:46 am
Last seen: 2023-11-09 5:52 am
Topics: 1 / Replies: 2487
Reply
RE: 3D Printer Corner

@inq If "size matters" for you, then you shoud check out Ivan Miranda who has built many 3D printers and used the parts to bootstrap his way up to ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@jaz939 So, you're telling me that you have a sensor whose instantiation you're calling aqi and a second, different sensor whose instantiation you'...

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@jaz939 It appears that you've directly copied the 'test' example for the library. So, the setup and execution should be OK as the example code wor...

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@jaz939 I suggest that you insert some println statements into the .cpp file to determine exactly where the function: bool Adafruit_PM25AQI::read...

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Daisy chaining 14 pin shift registers

@fritigern Google yielded ... which has a diagram of linked ICs.

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@zander OK, using a different library is probably the cause for the extra errors. Thanks for the explanation.

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@zander Which include was spelled incorrectly ? I googled both #include"Adafruit_PM25AQI.h" and #include"bme68xLibrary.h" and downlo...

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Help with I2C programming ESP32 and two sensors

@jaz939 I didn't understand your last post, but try changing the ;act part of your sketch as follows ... //**************************************...

2 months ago
Forum
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

@inq Yeah, 7, 9 and 13 looked pretty good but didn't seem to lead anywhere in the long run. Robot builder's extrema sounds promising at first rea...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

@inq No, I don't think I have a clear concept of a superior fitness calculation. I'd like to see something that rewards a bot that covers a lot of ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

@inq Wow, number 4 looks like a great ancestor ! It seems to have a lot of potential for obstacle avoidance AND your future mapping bot (at least a...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Hi from England

@myoldlandy Welcome to the forum.

2 months ago
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

In the other post, I suggested (actual distance travelled)/(potential distance travelled). If you calculate the distance from [X0,Y0] (the cart center...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

@inq I think the only difference is that I was suggesting calculating the absolute distance (i.e. the square root of the sum of squared differences...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: InqEgg - One step forward, two steps back...

@inq Would it be possible to substitute some expression of (actual distance travelled)/(potential distance travelled) instead of the difference in ...

2 months ago
Page 1 / 166